Federal vs. State Policy Free Essays

An open strategy is the assortment of rules that support the activity of lawful frameworks in each state. In this paper I am going to discuss government alongside state arrangements. I will talk about every one of the approaches and how they are comparative and how they are extraordinary. We will compose a custom article test on Government versus State Policy or then again any comparable point just for you Request Now Government and State arrangements are made to help keep our Country running easily. On the off chance that there were no arrangements, at that point protecting our Country would be a hard errand. Strategies are rules that are set to help cause our Country to work on a day by day bases.I like to consider it decides that are set to protect our Country; in such a case that there were no guidelines then everybody would do whatever them might feeling like doing which could cause for a muddled circumstance. We see cops out on the roads ensuring that everybody is complying with the laws that are set. Noadays there are laws against speeding, chatting on PDAs while driving, messaging while at the same time driving alongside murder, capturing and a lot more laws. These laws where not generally set up they were included as they were required and once they were caused a law they to have consistently remained as such. In the event that we see mobile phones for example this is a to some degree new thing and that state officials are seeing that there are issues with the utilization of PDAs. Gradually states are making laws to boycott PDA use while heading to help protect resident from people who need fixation while driving. The central government never saw themselves as the gathering that would be liable for wrongdoing inside the United States. The central government would have a job when it came to extraordinary criminal behavior.Crimes, for example, bank theft, seizing, and tax avoidance would be wrongdoings that they would be engaged with (Marion Oliver, 2006). The central government is consistently there to enable the state to police offices when they need the assistance or help with the criminal equity association. What job does the Federal Government play in the approach making forms? The government â€Å"can manage a for all intents and purposes boundless scope of exercises accepted to add t o road wrongdoing (ambush, assault, theft, robbery, medicate managing, murder) clerical wrongdoing (extortion, tricky usiness rehearses, illicit money related transations) (Marion Oliver, 2006 p. 354). † The government has been increasingly associated with the control of arrangement inside the previous 40 years (Marion Oliver, 2006). The government can manage wrongdoing inside specific zones. The government has certain units that are liable for specific sorts of crimes. The government can concoct the arrangement. They can compose it and they can give the fund that is expected to execute the arrangement. They can energize the neighborhood alongside state organizations to authorize or follow the approach. The central government alongside state agenvcies need to cooperate to make the strategies to beome a law. On the off chance that congress passes a government law, at that point the bureaucratic offices can authorize that law. In the event that it is government, at that point they can make a move yet on the off chance that it isn't administrative, at that point they have to nearby and state offices to go out and implement the approaches. The significant thing to remember is that full and complete comprehension of the arrangement should be clarified to all who will be answerable for enforing the strategy or law. The national government is gigantic we as a whole know about that.If we take a gander at it from a business perspective they are the greatest out there. With this said in light of the fact that they are tremendous it makes it so they can â€Å"provide human, monetary, and educational resources†¦. what's more, is in a novel situation to coordinate†¦. interjurisdictional anticrime plans (Marion Oliver, 2006 p. 354). † This is were the government is most powerfull. I life cash is force and let's be honest the government has a great deal of it. This makes it with the goal that the national government hugy affects the criminal equity system.We perceive how the central government offers awards to neighborhood and state police organizations and these reserve help to battle wrongdoing. The national government helps colossally with regards to the United State battling wrongdoing. Giving assets to police organizations makes and has rolled out enormous improvements in policing and we can thank the government for giving this viewpoint. State agenies and strategies are perplexing without a doubt. Not at all like government the state portion not have the â€Å"control over the working of propositions offices (Marion Oliver, 2006 p. 356). The state anyway can set strategies alongside systems that the law requirement organization is to follow. The state level is additionally ready to set measures for preparing, confirmation alongside recertification these neighborhood law implementation is required to follow what the state sets. The state likewise is a go between so to represent the neighborhood and government offices. On the off chance that there are gives for example it might be given to the state and afterward the state will give it to the nearby agenicies. I like to consider arrangements pre laws they are not a law yet but rather they are on there way.Federal and State are ableto set approaches and uphold strategies. State has nearby law implementation to enfocrce the laws. In the event that it is a law the government needs to authorize they can do as such. In the event that a wrongdoing is practice that Congress has past, at that point the central government can uphold that strategy. Additionally the national government has the ability to give financing to the state to assist them with upholding a strategy. They resemble a major business that has the labor alongside the assets expected to make enormous things occur and to roll out essential improvement in a business.The central government can roll out huge improvements in the criminal equity framework due to the assets and awards that they can gracefully so the state can uphold the arrangements. Simultaneously the state doesn't have a similar force that the central government has. The state can advance their own approaches and implement them however the central government has more capacities then that of the state.Reference Marion, N. E. , Oliver, W. M. (2006). The open arrangement of wrongdoing and criminal equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. The most effective method to refer to Federal versus State Policy, Papers

College Essay Productivity Tips Play With The Essay

College Essay Productivity Tips Play With The Essay College Essay Productivity Tips: Play With The Essay College Essay Productivity Tips: Play With The Essay School is back in session and we know youre already feeling the burn. The homework has piled up  up and the extracurriculars are swallowing your afternoons. When are you supposed to find time to start that pesky college essay (that you were supposed to write this summer, but no biggie we wont tell anyone.) Would it be easier to set aside an hour if we told you writing your college essay could beFUN? Here are a few tips for how to shove the assignments aside and dig into the truly entertaining experience of starting your  college admissions essay. Make a playdate. Does the thought of scheduling a time to sit down and write your essay make you break out in a cold sweat? It shouldnt were telling you, this is going to be fun. Put a date in your calendar and stick to it. Bring a bag of cookies with you to your desk. Cookies make everything better. Play games. All those icebreakers you know and love make for excellent writing prompts. Two truths and a lie. What animal would you be and why?  Take it from us these creative brain exercises are lot more fun than the Stare At The Common Application Prompts While Feeling Despondent  game. Don’t worry about it. Free-writing, a popular technique, encourages writers  to ignore grammar, punctuation, and word limits in favor of getting as many unfiltered ideas on the page as possible. Take that AP English teachers of the world! Mwahahaha! Start with an essay prompt and write whatever comes to mind. If you begin to run dry, just write that you can no longer think of what to write until you pick up a new thread. Give yourself a time limit of 5-10 minutes for each prompt. Most of what you write will be unusable, but even if you mine one gem from your efforts, youve won. Word association! Time for mom and dad to do some work. Ask them each to list five words that describe you. While youre at it, ask your sister and your best friend as well. Maybe even your AP English teacher.  Gather a handful  of these words and then try to attach  past experiences you’ve had to these  traits. Its the match game but with your life! Get crafty. Not every student loves to write, but as YouTube and podcasts  and internet memes have shown us, there are many ways to express yourself in 2014. Try answering essay prompts in non-verbal ways before you try to put them on paper.  Paint a picture, record a song, film a makeup tutorial.  You won’t be able to submit these efforts to admissions, but they might eventually inspire your words. Go on Facebook. Seriously. Finally! An excuse to scan social media venues for hours in search of an  essay topic. Really though depending on how you use social media, trends in the content you post could lead you to some excellent topic ideas. Its research mom, I swear. Check out more  Tips for Brainstorming Essay Topics. Contact us  to start increasing YOUR productivity! Read about this years Common App questions. About CEA HQView all posts by CEA HQ »

A Cold Wind Blows to Burden the City - Literature Essay Samples

Ostensibly, the Ann Petry’s novel The Street describes the work’s windy urban setting and introduces the protagonist Lutie Johnson and her desire to find an apartment that suits her needs. On a deeper level, this novel portrays the ever-present and all-encompassing challenges of life in the city as well as the perseverance necessary to overcome this struggle. Through sensory language and diction, the image of a personified wind exemplifies the harshness of city life, indirectly characterizing Lutie Johnson as a determined and patient individual. The speaker’s strong diction personifies the wind as the city’s mischievous and aggressive antagonist. There is not a single moment of comfort with this â€Å"cold November wind† (1). From the very beginning, it is mercilessly â€Å"blowing through 116th street† (1-2) and â€Å"[driving] most of the people off the street in the block between Seventh and Eighth Avenues† (5-7). It raucously â€Å"[rattles] the tops of garbage cans, [sucks] window shades out through the top of opened windows, and [sets] them flapping† (2-4), the violent verbs implying the wind’s power and the city’s inhospitable nature. As a result, â€Å"hurried pedestrians have to â€Å"[bend] double in an effort to offer the least possible exposed surface† (8-9) to the â€Å"barrages of paper† (17) that â€Å"swirled into [their] faces† (17). It even attacked â€Å"chicken bones and pork-chop bones† (19-20), which connote death. The wind’s affectionless acts substantiate the city’s cruel and uncomfortable atmosphere. In the same way, the detailed imagery of the wind’s indiscriminate attacks make it a symbol of the universality of the hardships of city life. Although the excerpt focuses on Lutie Johnson’s response to the wind’s torture, she is not the only one with conflict with the wind; rather, this is a struggle shared among all, for no person or thing is safe from its â€Å"violent assault† (9). The wind finds â€Å"every scrap of paper along the street† (10) no matter how big or how small. It attacks â€Å"theater throwaways, announcements of dances and lodge meetings†¦heavy waxed paper†¦thinner waxed paper†¦old envelopes, newspapers† (11-15), the asyndeton of these objects representing the wind’s rapidity and randomness. The â€Å"dirt and dust and grime on the sidewalk† that the wind lifts up make breathing, seeing, and walking difficult for innocent pedestrians, the polysyndeton of these obstructions reflecting the vict ims’ consequently slower pace. Furthermore, the wind toys with and bullies the cityfolk, wrapping â€Å"newspaper around their feet entangling them until the people cursed†¦stamped†¦kicked† (28-29) and â€Å"were forced to stoop and dislodge the paper† (30) just so that the wind could grab â€Å"their hats, [pry] their scarves from around their necks, [stick] fingers inside their coat collars, [blow] their coats away from their bodies† (31-34). Just as there is no privacy or break from the harshness of city-life, the wind does not relent as it invades peoples clothes and makes it difficult to walk through the streets. Ironically, the wind’s determination to inconvenience the city’s inhabitants emphasizes Lutie Johnson’s own tenacity and adaptability in the face of adversity. Just like the wind â€Å"took time to rush into doorways and areaways† (18-19), Lutie patiently waited until the wind â€Å"held [the sign] still for an instant† (56-57), so that she could discover if the advertised apartment met her needs. Although at times she â€Å"felt suddenly naked and bald† (36-37) when the wind would lift her â€Å"hair away from the back of her neck† (35-36), touch â€Å"the back of her neck and [explore] the sides of her head† (39-40), she endured the wind’s abuse, so she could accomplish her mission. Moreover, despite being a woman of mettle, she remained undaunted by the sign whose â€Å"metal had slowly rusted, making a dark red stain like blood† (54-55), this pun possibly foreshadowing an unpleasant future if she remains in the city. While the wind â€Å"did everything it could to discourage the people walking along the street† (21-22), Lutie did everything she could to find a suitable apartment, so her persistence is rewarded with a â€Å"reasonable† (61) apartment with â€Å"three rooms, steam heat, parquet floors, respectable tenants† (60-61). The opposition between the wind’s impish acts and Lutie Johnson’s persistence display how one can build character through hardship. Through diction, imagery, personification, and indirect characterization, this excerpt provides a pessimistic and discouraging yet realistic view of life in the city. Constantly overwhelmed by people and the stress of daily activity, the city provides very little privacy or solace. However, as shown by the city peoples, and particularly, Lutie Johnson’s constant battles with the wind, this struggle is an integral part of an urban lifestyle that may require great determination but can yield worthwhile rewards.

The Asch Conformity Experiments and Social Pressure

The Asch Conformity Experiments, conducted by psychologist Solomon Asch in the 1950s, demonstrated the power of conformity in groups and showed that even simple objective facts cannot withstand the distorting pressure of group influence. The Experiment In the experiments, groups of male university students were asked to participate in a perception test. In reality, all but one of the participants were confederates (collaborators with the experimenter who only pretended to be participants). The study was about how the remaining student would react to the behavior of the other participants. The participants of the experiment (the subject as well as the confederates) were seated in a classroom and were presented with a card with a simple vertical black line drawn on it. Then, they were given a second card with three lines of varying length labeled A, B, and C. One line on the second card was the same length as that on the first, and the other two lines were obviously longer and shorter. Participants were asked to state out loud in front of each other which line, A, B, or C, matched the length of the line on the first card. In each experimental case, the confederates answered first, and the real participant was seated so that he would answer last. In some cases, the confederates answered correctly, while in others, the answered incorrectly. Aschs goal was to see if the real participant would be pressured to answer incorrectly in the instances when the Confederates did so, or whether their belief in their own perception and correctness would outweigh the social pressure provided by the responses of the other group members. Results Asch found that one-third of real participants gave the same wrong answers as the Confederates at least half the time. Forty percent gave some wrong answers, and only one-fourth gave correct answers in defiance of the pressure to conform to the wrong answers provided by the group. In interviews he conducted following the trials, Asch found that those that answered incorrectly, in conformance with the group, believed that the answers given by the Confederates were correct, some thought that they were suffering a lapse in perception for originally thinking an answer that differed from the group, while others admitted that they knew that they had the correct answer, but conformed to the incorrect answer because they didnt want to break from the majority. The Asch experiments have been repeated many times over the years with students and non-students, old and young, and in groups of different sizes and different settings. The results are consistently the same with one-third to one-half of the participants making a judgment contrary to fact, yet in conformity with the group, demonstrating the strong power of social influences. Connection to Sociology The results of Aschs experiment resonate with what we know to be true about the nature of social forces and norms in our lives. The behavior and expectations of others shape how we think and act on a daily basis because what we observe among others teaches us what is normal, and expected of us. The results of the study also raise interesting questions and concerns about how knowledge is constructed and disseminated, and how we can address social problems that stem from conformity, among others. Updated  by Nicki Lisa Cole, Ph.D.

What Made Charlemagne so Great

Charlemagne. For centuries his name has been legend. Carolus Magnus (Charles the Great), King of the Franks and Lombards, Holy Roman Emperor, the subject of numerous epics and romances—he was even made a saint. As a figure of history, he is larger than life. But who was this legendary king, crowned emperor of all of Europe in the year 800? And what did he truly achieve that was great? Charles the Man We know a fair amount about Charlemagne from a biography by Einhard, a scholar at  court and an admiring friend. Although there are no contemporary portraits, Einhards description of the Frankish leader gives us a picture of a large, robust, well-spoken, and charismatic individual. Einhard maintains that Charlemagne was exceedingly fond of all his family, friendly to foreigners, lively, athletic (even playful at times), and strong-willed. Of course, this view must be tempered with established facts and the realization that Einhard held the king he had so loyally served in high esteem, but it still serves as an excellent starting point for understanding the man who became the legend. Charlemagne was married five times and had numerous concubines and children. He kept his large family around him nearly always, occasionally bringing his sons at least along with him on campaigns. He respected the Catholic Church enough to heap wealth upon it (an act of political advantage as much as spiritual reverence), yet he never subjected himself wholly to religious law. He was undoubtedly a man who went his own way. Charles the Associate King As per the tradition of inheritance known as gavelkind, Charlemagnes father, Pepin III, divided up his kingdom equally between his two legitimate sons. He gave Charlemagne the outlying areas of Frankland, bestowing the more secure and settled interior upon his younger son, Carloman. The elder brother proved to be up to the task of dealing with the rebellious provinces, but Carloman was no military leader. In 769 they joined forces to deal with a rebellion in Aquitaine: Carloman did virtually nothing, and Charlemagne subdued the rebellion most effectively without his help. This caused considerable friction between the brothers  which their mother, Berthrada, smoothed over until Carlomans death in 771. Charles the Conqueror Like his father and his grandfather before him, Charlemagne broadened  and consolidated the Frankish nation through force of arms. His conflicts with Lombardy, Bavaria, and the Saxons not only expanded his national holdings but also served to strengthen the Frankish military and keep the aggressive warrior class occupied. Moreover, his numerous and impressive victories, especially his crushing of tribal rebellions in Saxony, gained Charlemagne the enormous respect of his nobility as well as the awe and even the fear of his people. Few would defy such a fierce and powerful military leader. Charles the Administrator Having acquired more territory than any other European monarch of his time, Charlemagne was forced to create new positions and adapt old offices to suit new necessities. He delegated authority over provinces to worthy Frankish nobles. At the same time, he also understood that the various people he had brought together in one nation were still members of distinct ethnic groups, and he allowed each group to retain its own laws in local areas. To ensure justice, he saw to it that each groups laws were set down in writing and carefully enforced. He also issued capitularies, decrees that applied to everyone in the realm, regardless of ethnicity. While he enjoyed life at his royal court in Aachen, he kept an eye on his delegates with  envoys called  missi dominici, whose job it was to inspect the provinces and report back to the court. The missi were very visible representatives of the king and acted with his authority. The basic framework of Carolingian government, though by no means rigid or universal, served the king well because in all cases power stemmed from Charlemagne himself, the man who had conquered and subdued so many rebellious peoples. It was his personal reputation that made Charlemagne an effective leader; without the threat of arms from the warrior-king, the administrative system he had devised would, and later did, fall apart. Charles the Patron of Learning Charlemagne was not a man of letters, but he understood the value of education and saw that it was in serious decline. So he gathered together at his court some of the finest minds of his day, most notably  Alcuin, Paul the Deacon,  and Einhard. He sponsored monasteries where ancient books were preserved and copied. He reformed the palace school and saw to it that  monastic schools  were set up throughout the realm. The idea of learning was given a time and a place to flourish. This Carolingian Renaissance was an isolated phenomenon. Learning did not catch fire throughout Europe. Only in the royal court, monasteries, and schools was there any real focus on education. Yet because of Charlemagnes interest in preserving and reviving knowledge, a wealth of ancient manuscripts was copied for future generations. Just as important, a tradition of learning was established in European monastic communities that Alcuin and St. Boniface before him had sought to realize, overcoming the threat of the extinction of Latin culture. While their isolation from the Roman Catholic Church sent the famous Irish monasteries into decline, European monasteries were firmly established as  keepers of knowledge  thanks in part to the Frankish king. Charles the Emperor Although  Charlemagne  had by the end of the eighth century certainly built an empire, he did not hold the title of Emperor. There was already an emperor in  Byzantium, one who was considered to hold the title in the same tradition as the  Roman Emperor Constantine  and whose name was  Constantine VI. While Charlemagne was no doubt conscious of his own achievements in terms of acquired territory and a strengthening of his realm, it is doubtful he ever sought to compete with the Byzantines or even saw any need to claim an illustrious appellation beyond King of the Franks. So when  Pope Leo III  called on him for assistance when faced with charges of simony, perjury, and adultery, Charlemagne acted with careful deliberation. Ordinarily, only the  Roman Emperor  was qualified to pass judgment on a pope, but recently Constantine VI had been killed, and the woman responsible for his death, his mother, now sat on the throne. Whether it was because she was a murderess or, more likely, because she was a woman, the pope and other leaders of the Church did not consider appealing to  Irene of Athens  for judgment. Instead, with Leos agreement, Charlemagne was asked to preside over the popes hearing. On December 23, 800, he did so, and Leo was cleared of all charges. Two days later, as Charlemagne rose from prayer at Christmas mass, Leo placed a crown on his head and proclaimed him Emperor. Charlemagne was indignant and later remarked that had he known what the pope had in mind, he would never have entered the church that day, even though it was such an important religious festival. While  Charlemagne never used the title Holy Roman Emperor, and did his best to appease the Byzantines, he did use the phrase Emperor, King of the Franks and Lombards. So it  is doubtful that Charlemagne minded  being  an emperor. Rather, it was the bestowal of the title  by the pope and the power it gave the Church over Charlemagne and other secular leaders that concerned him.  With guidance from his trusted advisor Alcuin, Charlemagne ignored the Church-imposed restrictions on his power and continued to go his own way as ruler of Frankland, which now occupied a huge portion  of Europe. The concept of an emperor in the West had been established, and it would take on much greater significance in centuries to come. The Legacy of Charles the Great While Charlemagne attempted to rekindle an interest in learning and unite disparate groups in one nation, he never addressed the technological and economic difficulties that Europe faced now that Rome no longer provided bureaucratic homogeneity. Roads and bridges fell into decay, trade with the wealthy East was fractured, and manufacturing was by necessity a localized craft instead of a widespread, profitable industry. But these are only failures if Charlemagnes goal was to rebuild the  Roman Empire. That such was his motive is doubtful at best.  Charlemagne was a Frankish warrior king with the background and traditions of the Germanic peoples. By his own standards and those of his time, he succeeded remarkably well. Unfortunately, it is one of these traditions that led to the true collapse of the Carolingian empire: gavelkind. Charlemagne treated the empire as his own personal property to disperse as he saw fit, and so he divided his realm equally among his sons. This man of vision for once failed to see a significant fact: that it was only the absence of  gavelkind  that made it possible for the Carolingian Empire to evolve into a true power. Charlemagne not only had Frankland all to himself after his brother died, his father, Pepin, had also become the sole ruler when Pepins brother renounced his crown to enter a monastery. Frankland had known three successive leaders whose strong personalities, administrative ability, and above all sole governorship of the country formed the empire into a prosperous and powerful entity. The fact that of all Charlemagnes heirs only  Louis the Pious  survived him means little; Louis also followed the tradition of  gavelkind  and, furthermore, almost single-handedly sabotaged the empire by being a little  too  pious. Within a century after Charlemagnes death in 814, the Carolingian Empire had fractured into dozens of provinces led by isolated nobles who lacked the ability to halt invasions by Vikings, Saracens, and Magyars. Yet for all that, Charlemagne still deserves the appellation great. As an adept military leader, an innovative administrator, a promoter of learning, and a significant political figure, Charlemagne stood head and shoulders above his contemporaries and built a true empire. Although that empire did not last, its existence and his leadership changed the face of Europe in  ways both striking and subtle  that are still felt to this day.

Key Concepts of Feminism The Nuclear Family

Feminist theorists have examined how emphasis on the nuclear family affects society’s expectations of women. Feminist writers have studied the nuclear family’s effect on women in groundbreaking books such as The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir and The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan. The Rise of the Nuclear Family The phrase nuclear family became commonly known during the first half of the 20th century. Historically, households in many societies had often consisted of groups of extended family members. In a more mobile, post-industrial revolution society, there was a greater emphasis on the nuclear family. Smaller family units could move more easily to find economic opportunities in other areas. In the increasingly developed and sprawling cities of the United States, more people could afford to buy houses. Therefore, more nuclear families lived in their own homes, rather than in larger households. Relevance to Feminism Feminists analyze gender roles, division of labor and society’s expectations of women. Many women of the 20th century were discouraged from working outside the home, even as modern appliances lessened the time required for housework. The transformation from agriculture to modern industrial jobs required one wage earner, usually the man, to leave the home for work at a different location. The emphasis on the nuclear family model often meant that each woman, one per household, was then encouraged to stay home and rear children. Feminists are concerned with why family and household arrangements are perceived as less than perfect or even abnormal if they stray from the nuclear family model.

The United States Support of Iraq´s Regime - 2447 Words

On January 29, 2002, United States President George W. Bush blasted Iraq with these words, â€Å"Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror†¦ States like these and their terrorist allies constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.† [State of the Union] But as late as 1990, Iraq had received major military, economic, and intelligence support from the U.S. [Arbuthnot] This aide included â€Å"numerous items that had both military and civilian applications, including poisonous chemicals and deadly biological viruses, such as anthrax and bubonic plague.† [Dobbs] It was this aide that gave Iraq the upper hand in its war against Iran and would later lead to Iraq’s ability to gas the Kurdish people of Northern Iraq in 1988. Despite the use of chemical weapons against the Kurds in 1988, the U.S. did not change their foreign policy in Iraq until 1990, when Iraq invaded and annexed Kuwait. Despite Husseinâ₠¬â„¢s actions against the Kurds in 1988, why did the US continue to support the regime economically and militarily? United States’ direct involvement in the country of Iraq began early in the 1960s. Fearing that the ever rising presence of communism throughout the world would spread to Iraq, the U.S. worried that the consequences of a move to Communist rule would impede U.S. political and economic interests in that area of the world. The United States kept its interest and stakes in the area by seeking to befriend the several regimes thatShow MoreRelatedThe Democratic Peace Theory : Political And Cultural Similarity And Limits Of Democracy1456 Words   |  6 Pagesin international relations, a majority of democratic countries would perfer to choose negotiations or other peaceful ways to resolve the dispute. rested on these factors, democratic countries could sustain the so-called peaceful state. In contrast, this peaceful state would not exist between non-democratic countries. the reasons why democratic countries can keep the peace cause. (1) Democratic Norms and Cultures.In Common, the so-called normative interpretation (Normative Explanations). The explanationRead MoreThe Reasons Behind The Uk Participation1412 Words   |  6 PagesThe Iraq war started on 20 March 2003 with the invasion of Iraq by the United States together with the United Kingdom against the Baath Party of Saddam Hussein. The overt reason behind the war was accusing Iraq of possessing weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and what reinforced the doubts was Saddam Hussein s refusing to co-operate with the United Nations inspectors in their search for his forbidden weapons of mass destruction at the beginning . However, even after the fall of Iraq, invadersRead MoreThe Fall Of The Ottoman Empire1357 Words   |  6 Pagesthe fall of the Ottoman Empire in 1919, United States President Woodrow Wilson put in a large effort in starting the League of Nations. The League, founded on January 10, 1920, pushed for a mandate system in the Middle East, replacing that of the Sykes-Picot. The mandates took away the sovereignty of the territory’s previous owner and transferred controlment to individual states in the Allied Powers. France came to own Syria and modern-day Lebanon and both Iraq and Palestine became British territoriesRead MoreAmerica s Invasion Of Iraq1143 Words   |  5 PagesPolarizing Topic: America’s Invasion of Iraq The Iraq war is a highly polarizing topic in the United States and abroad alike. After the attacks of September 11, 2001, there were a lot of discussions on terrorism, but former U.S. President George Bush (in office 2001-2009) addressed things differently. In the new globalized world, as we know, you need consensus amongst constituent nations to gain support for a war. However, the Iraq war did not have the support that was needed to build a successfulRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Novel, 19841242 Words   |  5 PagesIn the novel, 1984, George Orwell describes a dystopian future in which the citizens are living under the control of a totalitarian regime. The â€Å"Party†, Orwell’s version of the modern day government, used their power to keep constant surveillance of the citizens, censor information, and manipulate the people. Through the use of telescreens and microphones, the Party was able to watch and listen to the citizens whenever they were in range. Party members were also responsible for the systematic destructionRead More`` Questing For Monsters `` By John Mueller, An American Political Scientist Essay1592 Words   |  7 Pagessummer of 1950, Stalin believed North Korean leader, Kim Il Sung when he said he was â€Å"absolutely certain of success.† However, Stalin made it clear the USSR would not be footing the bill for a war in Korea if Sung was wrong, and he was. Once the United States sided with the South Koreans, the war became a fiasco instead of the quick, easy, and cheap spread of Communism Stalin thought he was signing on for, and Korea has never been stable since. Similarly, on September 11, 2001, al Qaeda underestimatedRead MoreThe Iranian Revolution Of Iran951 Words   |  4 PagesJust months after a radical revolution upset the regime of the Iranian Shah and shook up the balance of power in Iran, Iraq invaded Iran and sparked an eight year long war that would set the tone for future relations within the region. Yet, why did this war begin? Overall, the Iranian Revolution was an unprecedented upheaval that catastrophically changed the environment of the Arab Gulf region. Unsatisfied and displeased with the pro-Western Iranian Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, the population of IranRead MoreThe United States And The Middle East1653 Words   |  7 Pages Over the past decade, wars and interventions in the Middle East have broken up existing states, fostered sectarianism and destroyed infrastructures, creating the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. After years of revolutionary upheaval, the Arab world s old system is on the verge of collapse. The United States and other countries bear the blame for this emergence and growth of the indigenous movements like the Taliban, AL-Qaeda, and IS. Order in the Middle East has been undermined by corrupt andRead MoreA Brief Note On The And Foreign Involvement908 Words   |  4 PagesISIS and Foreign Involvement In Syria civil war has been raging since March 2011. The conflict an attempt to overthrow the second Assad regime, led by Bashar al Assad, and multiple rebel groups, including the Free Syrian Army (FSA), the Islamic Front, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria(ISIS), and Jabhat al-Nusra (the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda). Like his father, who held power before him, Bashar al Assad has been a corrupt tyrant who rigged elections and eliminated personal freedoms. TwoRead MoreWar Againsts Iraq: The Media, Its Portrayal of the War and the Effect of Its Perspective1374 Words   |  6 PagesWar against Iraq By Olivier Gaudreau When the US initiated the 2003 invasion of Iraq, it gave the justification that the Iraqi dictator, Saddam aided the perpetrators of the September 11 attack on United States soil. The Bush administration also accused Saddam of engineering a nuclear program and amassing destructive weapons. All the US justification and the entire war have been highly criticized on many fronts. The media has taken the lead on shaping public opinion on both sides of the war, that